Clinical and Scientific Studies
2023 - September | AVADENT DENTURE BASE ADAPTION
Faty MA, Sabet ME, Thabet YG. A Comparison of Denture Base Retention and Adaptation Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fabrication Techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Sep 12;36(4):469-478. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7193. PMID: 37699188.
AvaDent milled denture bases demonstrated better retention and adaptation than the conventional heat-polymerized and printed denture bases.
2023 - JANUARY | AVADENT TEETH BONDING STRENGTH SURPASSES 3D-PRINTED AND CONVENTIONAL
Amr Mohamed,, Atsushi Takaichi, Yuka Kajima, Hidekazu Takahashi,Noriyuki Wakabayashi. Bond strength of CAD/CAM denture teeth to a denture base resin in a milled monolithic unit. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2023, January.
After thermocycling, AvaDent monolithic denture technology exhibited significantly higher tooth to base bond strength as compared to 3D printed and conventional dentures.
2022 - MAY | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
Fouda SM, Gad MM, Abualsaud R, et al: Flexural Properties and Hardness of CAD-CAM Denture Base Materials. J Prosthodont 2023;32:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13535
AvaDent milled denture base resin had the highest flexural strength, modulus, and hardness among the groups testing, including convention heat-cured and 3D printed resins.
2022 - MAY | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
Fouda SM, Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Ellakany P, AlRumaih HS, Khan SQ, Akhtar S, Al-Qarni FD, Al-Harbi FA. Flexural Properties and Hardness of CAD-CAM Denture Base Materials. J Prosthodont. 2022 May 14. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13535. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35567362.
AvaDent had greater flexural properties and hardness compared to heat-polymerized acrylic resin and 3D-printed resins.
2022 - april | AVADENT DENTURE BASE – HIGHER FLEXURAL STRENGTH VS. 3D PRINTED AND CONVENTIONAL PROCESSES
Abualsaud, Reem; Gad, Mohammed M., Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, 12(2):p 160-170, Mar–Apr 2022.
Milled AvaDent base demonstrated higher flexural strength vs. 3D printed denture bases and conventionally fabricated denture bases, allowing thinner design and reducing effect on speech. PMMA resins remain the materials of choice to fabricate denture bases with high flexural strength.
2022 - MARCH | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
Zeidan AAE, Sherif AF, Baraka Y, Abualsaud R, Abdelrahim RA, Gad MM, Helal MA. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Construction Techniques of CAD-CAM Milled, 3D-Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins on Flexural Strength: An In Vitro Comparative Study. J Prosthodont. 2022 Mar 28. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13514. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35343012.
CAD-CAM milled DBRs showed the highest flexural strength when compared with conventional compression-molded or 3D-printed DBRs
2022 - FEBRUARY | THICKNESS OF AVADENT DENTURES VS. 3D PRINTED DENTURES
Alaseef N, Albasarah S, Al Abdulghani H, Al-Harbi FA, Gad MM, Akhtar S, Khan SQ, Ateeq IS, Al-Qarni FD. CAD-CAM Fabricated Denture Base Resins: In Vitro Investigation of the Minimum Acceptable Denture Base Thickness. J Prosthodont. 2022 Jan 31. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13486. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35102627.
AvaDent Dentures can be made to a minimum thickness of 1.5mm vs. 3D printed dentures which have a minimum thickness of 2.0mm
2021 - august | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Kamnoedboon P, Mekki M, Durual S, Özcan M, Müller F. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. J Dent. 2021 Nov; 114:103785. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103785. Epub 2021 Aug 20. PMID: 34419480.
AvaDent Monolithic Dentures have physical properties that are superior to 3D printed dentures.
2021 - may | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
Baba NZ, Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Müller F, Wagner S. CAD/CAM Complete Denture Systems and Physical Properties: A Review of the Literature. J Prosthodont. 2021 May;30(S2):113-124.
AvaDent Monolithic Dentures have physical properties that are superior to conventionally processed and 3D printed dentures.
2021 - january | AVADENT FEWER PATIENT VISITS
Clark WA, Brazile B, Matthews D, Solares J, De Kok IJ. A Comparison of Conventionally Versus Digitally Fabricated Denture Outcomes in a University Dental Clinic. J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan;30(1):47-50. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13273. Epub 2020 Oct 23. PMID: 33058337.
AvaDent digital dentures required fewer patient appointments from start to finish, and fewer postoperative appointments than conventionally fabricated dentures.
2020 - september | AVADENT ACRYLIC COLOR STABILITY
Gruber S, Kamnoedboon P, Özcan M, Srinivasan M. CAD/CAM Complete Denture Resins: An In Vitro Evaluation of Color Stability. J Prosthodont. 2021 Jun;30(5):430-439. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13246. Epub 2020 Sep 9. PMID: 32864812.
AvaDent dentures have better color stability as compared to dentures manufactured with 3D printed resins.
2019 - july | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
Aguirre BC, Chen JH, Kontogiorgos ED, Murchison DF, Nagy WW. Flexural strength of denture base acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Apr;123(4):641-646. doi: 10.1016 / j.prosdent. 2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Jul 26. PMID: 31353106.
CAD/CAM milled denture base had significantly higher flexural strength compared to injection and compression molded denture bases.
2019 - january | AVADENT ACCURACY OF DENTURE PRODUCTION VS. DESIGN
Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):637-643. doi: 10.1016 / j.prosdent. 2018.09.001 . Epub 2019 Jan 31. PMID: 30711292.
AvaDent dentures are significantly more accurate than 3D printed dentures.
2018 - june | AVADENT ACRYLIC STRENGTH
AvaDent recorded higher mean flexural modulus vs. conventionally processed denture materials and less variability.
AvaDent recorded higher mean flexural modulus vs. conventionally processed denture materials and less variability.
2018 - february | FIT OF AVADENT DENTURE VS. CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I, Steinmassl PA. CAD/CAM produces dentures with improved fit. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2829-2835. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2369-2. Epub 2018 Feb 22. PMID: 29468600.
AvaDent dentures fit better than conventional dentures.
2017 - may | ACCURACY OF TOOTH POSITION
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture tooth movement between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jan;119(1):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 May 12. PMID: 28506652.
AvaDent produced the best combination of accuracy and reproducibility of the tested techniques.
2017 - february | FIT OF AVADENT DENTURE VS. CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17. PMID: 27765399.
The retention offered by milled complete denture bases from prepolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) resin was significantly higher than that offered by conventional heat- polymerized denture bases.
2016 - april | FIT OF AVADENT DENTURE VS. CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Apr 23. PMID: 27112416.
AvaDent process was the most accurate and reproducible denture fabrication technique when compared with pack and press, pour, and injection denture base processing techniques.
FIT OF AVADENT DENTURE VS. CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17. PMID: 27765399.
Retention of AvaDent denture was significantly higher than that offered by conventional heat- polymerized denture bases.
2015 - December | CLINICAL EFFICIENCY
Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Dec;114(6):818-25. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 26. PMID: 26412000.
AvaDent process proved to be an equally effective and more time-efficient option than the conventional process of prosthesis fabrication in the predoctoral program.
